Jump to content
Kingdom of Adventistan

Dr. Ronald Lawson Speaks


Recommended Posts

See:

http://spectrummagazine.org/article/2017/01/19/adventist-forum-grows-new-north-carolina-chapter

Dr. Lawson is a retired professor of history from Queens College in New York City.  His career has included a number of publications related to SDA history.  I remember him most for bringing to light previously unknown facts related to the SDA Church in Germany during the time of Hitler.  As to this, I believe that while his work may serve as a foundation, others should investigate this issue further as I believe that there is more to be learned.

I consider the following quote, taken from the above article, to be quite interesting:

Quote

At the Metro NY Adventist Forum, we, in fact, became an independent congregation with the blessing of Neal Wilson, then GC VP for North America. The group was founded in 1968 by Adventist graduate students at Columbia U. and the Juilliard School, seeking fellowship, the opportunity to discuss issues raised in their classes, and current puzzling church issues.

The initial idea was to become a church or a company attached to the conference, but the issue of which conference (at a time when they were very segregated) was inevitably raised for the membership was multi-racial. In 1968, the year Martin Luther King was assassinated, this was a serious problem for graduate students. So they wrote to Wilson asking to be affiliated at the Union level in order to avoid the racial choice. 

He spent a day with them, announced that the church did not have the flexibility to allow what they had suggested; instead, he suggested that they be an independent congregation that set out to maintain positive ties to the church.

End of quote.

 

For a GC VP to suggest that a local congregation be independent of the denomination is interesting and probably more complex that Dr. Lawson has reported.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 11 months later...

Dr. Lawson is a person who is controversal in Adventism.  I respect him for the fact that he has fought to remain a part of this church and for his academic writings about this denomination.

He has established a website on which he intends to post his academic writings.  That website is not complete yet.  It may be accessed at: 

https://ronaldlawson.net/ 

It also contains links to other websites of his with some of his writings.

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 4 months later...
  • 4 months later...

Many years ago, I read some very informative articles about certain issues that took place between certain elements of the SDA Church in Germany and Hitler.  I believe that they were written by Dr. Lawson.  I hope that they can be recovered and posted.

NOTE:  They may not be the ones that Dr. Lawson thinks that they are.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Years ago,  I read two (2) articles that discussed the role  that a couple of SDA Local Conferences played in Germany, during the time of  Hitler.  As I remember, they were written by Dr. Lawson.  I have asked Dr. Lawson about those two articles and he has only been able to point me to articles in which only brief mention was made.

So, that leaves me with the idea that perhaps my memory is wrong and it was not Dr. Lawson who wrote those articles.  Or, perhaps, Dr. Lawson did not understand my question and those two articles are buried deep into his files.  I hope that this is true and that they can be discovered and posted.

As an interesting point:   Dr. Lawson has focused on the SDA denomination and written many articles, which have been published, on aspects of  the SDA denomination.  I have not agreed with everything that he has published, but, it  remains that he has contributed to understanding this denomination.

I will suggest, that the value of those two articles that I read lies in the fact that they give additional information as to the events that occurred which resulted in the split between the SDA denomination and the so-called Reform Movement.  The bottom line is:  In that event, both sides engaged in inappropriate activity and both sides were at fault.

It should bee noted:

1)  Following the end of WWII, the GC attempted to bring the two sides together and heal the split and that attempt failed.

2)  In recent times, the two sides in Germany, have acknowledged their respective faults and have reached some healing of the split.  However, in the U.S. that split remains and in fact the so-called Reform Movement has actually split into two groups.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The information that I reference is specific.  In addition I have information, which may or may not have been obtained from Dr. Lawsons articles which provides the context for what those local SDAs did in relating to Hitler.  That context is important and clearly shows that the Reform Movement had some responsibility for what happened.  It should be noted that this part of the story has not been told to the members today of the Reform Movement.  Both sides were guilty of wrong.  The result of their actions were:

1)  The members of the Reform Movement suffered much under Hitler.  Yes, they  brought it upon themselves, or at least initiated it.

2)  Certain SDA leaders took the SDA Church, in their area, in a wrong direction.

You are correct as  far as there being very little information available as to what the SDA Church did in relating to Hitler.  That it why I believe that those two articles that I read years ago are very important.  I hope that they can be recovered, fi Dr. Lawson did not write them.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is an on-going project to share Dr Lawson's work publicly on this web site: https://ronaldlawson.net/

One new article was posted yesterday, and there will be new ones available each Sabbath, as far as that's within my control.

There is a trove of fascinating work that he has produced over decades, and even his academic writing is clear and accessible.

This week's one is an encyclopedia entry, as is next week's, so they are relatively short and written for a broad audience.

Edited by Bravus
Realised I was repeating myself in this thread
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for sharing Bravus. I knew Collen back in NYC, he was living at the New York Center, as it was called then. At that time I didn't know that he was homosexual! He even dedicated my daughter at our church. Its very sad for me to read about what's happen to him!! He definitely is in need of our prayers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bravus:

The correct spelling is:  Colin Cook.

Dr. Lawson has written on Colin Cook.  There is also much on the Internet about him.  This will include material that was published in official SDA magazines.  However, in my opinion,  anyone giving study to him, must include articles published in Westwood. 

Westwood is a weekly published in the Denver area.  It is an award winning, counter culture publication, that does investigative reporting.  I consider that the articles it published on Cook to have been critically important in ending the support that the SDA denomination provided Cook.   It must be noted that those articles were published many years ago.  So, it may not be easy to find them.

To get more personal:  The story of Colin Cook is a very sad one.  It is sad not only for him but for the many lives that he touched.  It is sad for the woman that he married and the family relationships that developed from that.  It is sad for the people who came to him for counseling.  It is was for the SDA denomination.  In all of the comments that may be posted in this forum, please let us be respectful and not make Cook the focus of anger.  He remains a human, loved by God.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah, thanks for the clarification, both of you. I've been very busy preparing the new papers and publishing them (we now have them scheduled and set up for the next several weeks, one per week) that I have read only some of the previously published papers. With the heads-up from you I did go back and read the paper on Colin Cook. It's a tragic story, and I do see him as the victim-become-abuser. If his faith had been compatible with his sexuality he could have been in an open, loving, consensual relationship and been a great service to people. The (in my view unnecessary) conflict led him into all manner of abuse of others. It's possible to condemn that abuse and the choices that led to it while still understanding and having compassion for the man.

Link to post
Share on other sites

...and perhaps if people do want to debate the church's attitude to sexuality and the problems with 'gay conversion' therapies (which have a vastly greater record of suicides than real 'successes') it would make sense to start a new thread outside this history forum?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I realised that I should probably provide the abstract of each week's new paper here when I announce that it has been published, just so people get a sense of whether it meets their interests. Here's the one for this week:

Quote


Seventh-day Adventism had urgently apocalyptic origins: as pre-millennialists, Adventists preached that the Second Coming of Christ and the end of the world was imminent. Although the urgency of the belief has ­moderated with the passage of time, they continue to cling to the doctrine­ that the Second Coming will take place “soon,” and this remains at the­ center of their evangelistic thrust. Today, they are established in 205 of ­the 230 countries recognized by the United Nations. In recent decades they­ have doubled their world membership every 10-12 years; growth has been­ concentrated in the Developing World.



Direct link: https://ronaldlawson.net/2018/11/09/apocalypticism-in-seventh-day-adventism/

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...

New paper this week. I found this one fascinating as I was reading through in the process of posting it. It's a related topic in a way to the previous couple of weeks, but this is a full paper rather than the shorter encyclopedia entries. The discussion of the smaller splinter groups in particular, toward the end, is very interesting.

https://ronaldlawson.net/2018/11/19/urgent-apocalypticism-in-adventism/

This is from Dr Lawson's new introduction to the paper, which was originally published 21 years ago:

October 22 this year (2018)1 was the 174th anniversary of what Adventists know as “The Great Disappointment.” It also means that Adventists have been proclaiming urgently that Jesus is returning “soon” for 174 years. After that many years, what does “soon” mean? How soon is “soon”? If the delay is the result of the need to complete the “pre-advent judgment” (previously known as “the Investigative Judgment”) this should surely make us wonder about the slow speed of God’s computer equipment compared to what we now have here on earth. If it is the result of the failure of all Christians to take the Gospel effectively to the “10-40 North Quadrant”, the huge sweep of population stretching from north Africa through the Middle East, Southern Asia, many of the former Soviet Republics, to China, Japan and much of Southeast Asia, then this suggests that, given our limited progress there, “soon” will be long indeed.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...